[…] his latest notion – that newspapers should walk away from a business grossing more than $30 billion a year – is just plain nutty.Vaya. Mutter pregunta a Andreessen por qué no aplicó esa forma de pensar cuando vio que Microsoft le comía el terreno a su Netscape inundando el mercado con un nuevo navegador gratuito llamado Explorer. Y le explica por qué no con todo detalle. Léalo. Termina así:
[…] you sure can’t transition a business to a new model by torching 90% of its existing revenue. There’s simply nothing constructive –or amusing– about this sort of thinking.
Mutter será acusado por los Palmeros 3.0 de "no pillarlo", de momia analógica, de perverso ludita. No se pierdan los comentarios. Hay uno de Judy Sims, el primero, muy bueno: tiene más razón que una santa:
I agree that it is ridiculous to abandon print revenue. But, I do believe that newspapers should be setting up separate digital divisions that act like true start-ups. As long as print and digital are tied together, protecting print revenues will trump digital innovation. That's not the way to prepare for the future.No quemen nada en Paper Papers 10/3/10
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario